Tennis Inside Numbers

Tennis Inside Numbers

Share this post

Tennis Inside Numbers
Tennis Inside Numbers
Pegula vs Kalinskaya: Berlin Final Analysis (WTA 500)

Pegula vs Kalinskaya: Berlin Final Analysis (WTA 500)

Jessie No. 5 - Pegula saved 5 match points, then won the last 5 points of the deciding set tie-break to claim her 5th career Tour title.

Tennis Inside Numbers's avatar
Tennis Inside Numbers
Jun 26, 2024
∙ Paid

Share this post

Tennis Inside Numbers
Tennis Inside Numbers
Pegula vs Kalinskaya: Berlin Final Analysis (WTA 500)
2
Share

cover 📸 credit: Wimbledon twitter

After missing the european clay-court swing with a rib injury, world #5 Jessica Pegula conquered her 5th career trophy in Berlin. The title arrived in Pegula’s 5th match win of her comeback (6th overall match, following 2 months out of the Tour) and required a few heroics — five times Anna Kalinskaya stood one point away from a first career title.

Pegula saved 4 match points serving at 4-5 in the third set and another one at 5-6. It was a complete reversal of what had happened until that moment: Kalinskaya had been 6-for-7 on break points, breaking serve in all 6 return games she reached break point.

But Pegula was clutch staring at defeat. And then she prevailed in the final set tie-break by winning the last 5 points of the match.

Each point is considered only once. Therefore, aces are not included in winner totals and double faults are not included in unforced error totals.

Thanks for reading! Tennis Inside Numbers is a reader-supported publication. If you enjoy our analyses, please consider a paid subscription. It grants you full-access to all posts and the comments section, and provides us a much appreciated boost.

Kalinskaya’s unconverted match points ended up reflecting key match factors.

1. Backhand Errors

  • MP #1 (4-5 15/40) → Kalinskaya backhand error after 5 shots

With both players generating most of their offense from the forehand side, limiting errors became the main goal for backhands.

In that regard, Pegula was the clear winner. She missed 28 backhands,17 less than Kalinskaya’s 45 backhand errors.

Forehand Performance

  • Pegula = 16 winners + 17 forcing shots / 43 errors

  • Kalinskaya = 27 winners + 23 forcing shots / 38 errors

Backhand Performance

  • Pegula = 8 winners + 9 forcing shots / 28 errors

  • Kalinskaya = 11 winners + 9 forcing shots / 45 errors

* Scores calculated according to: Winner +1; Forcing Shot +0.5; Unforced Error -1; Forced Error -0.5

2. Unreturned Serves

  • MP #2 (4-5 30/40) → unreturned wide AD serve

  • MP #5 (5-6 30/40) → unreturned T AD serve

Pegula had the edge in the serve/return dynamic.

Despite making only 70 1st serves compared to 85 by Kalinskaya, Pegula delivered 14 more unreturned 1st serves (25 vs 11).

Pegula hit 7 aces and another 18 1st serves that Kalinskaya had a racquet on but failed to return into court. Kalinskaya only managed 2 aces and 9 other 1st serves that ended on return errors from Pegula.

Pegula

  • 25 unreturned 1st serves (7 aces)

  • 7 unreturned 2nd serves

Kalinskaya

  • 11 unreturned 1st serves (2 aces)

  • 9 unreturned 2nd serves

3. Kalinskaya’s forehand unforced errors

  • MP #3 (4-5 40/AD) → Kalinskaya forehand error after 7 shots

  • Pegula’s match point (6-6 6:3) → Kalinskaya forehand error after 3 shots

Kalinskaya amassed 22 forehand unforced errors.

The majority of those errors (15 in total) were made from a central area of the baseline (marked by the blue circe in the right panel in the image below).

Kalinskaya’s point-winning (left panel) and point-losing forehands (right panel). Ball direction is from bottom to top. The majority of forehand unforced errors (15/22) were made from a central area of the baseline (marked by the blue circe on the right).

This post is for paid subscribers

Already a paid subscriber? Sign in
© 2025 Tennis Inside Numbers
Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Start writingGet the app
Substack is the home for great culture

Share